Red Cliffs Of Dawlish

Red Cliffs Of Dawlish
Red Cliffs Of Dawlish
Showing posts with label Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Power To The People

FLOW: "The psychology of optimal experience"

One of the best books I've ever come across and gladly though carefully share, here, is Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi 's "Flow: The psychology of optimal experience". Effectively or colloquially, the graph above represents the balance between a person's skill at an activity or task and the challenge level of applied  skill to this task. Invariably the conditions for "being in the zone" or as per sport "on fire" or "in a hot streak" etc etc require conditions such as clear problem and goal definitions and balance between the two variables. The conditions to reach FLOW itself are a balance between the two where: Challenge = Skill, but tend to emerge where skill is higher and challenge is higher to match that skill. Variations around this eg Skill >> Challange and you have Relaxation, where Challenge >> Skill you have Anxiety and where both are very low you have Apathy. We've already discussed how negative and deleterious too much Anxiety is to experience and how it reduces our decision-making capacity as per Our Government: "Ifs, Buts, Maybes" and again in Argumentum Ad Infinitum and hence perpetuated on a national scale in the Legacy News-Media in Understanding The Mountains of Madness.

 'High Skill : Challenge' ratio => experience of FLOW

This is all incredibly destructive behaviour to peoples' experience of politics: It accounts in my opinion for the "Apathy", "Boredom" and on ocassion the over-dose by design or ineptness of "Anxiety" the politicians inject into the national discourse in order that they may be on hand to relieve the pain later; having prolonged it, in the first place. These destroy our positive feedback-loops as per Pattern Recognition which is depend on Memory input as compared in Eurosceptic "Amnesia" vs Brexiteer "Total Memory Recall" .

What has to be done is to come back to the behaviour of our politicians, the ones who are supposed to represent the people, the "professionals"; the 650 MP's in our Houses of Parliament at Westminster and our 73 MEP's in the European Parliament in Brussels and Strasbourg. Quoting Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi  in FLOW, p.190-191:

Britain's present Representative Democracy: Predictable & Poor Scaling of Democracy
"A person is part of a family or a friendship to the extent he invests psychic energy in goals shared with other people. In the same way, one can belong to larger interpersonal systems by subscribing to the aspirations of a community, an ethnic group, a political party, or a nation.

In ancient Greek usage, "politics" referred to whatever involved people in affairs that went beyond personal and family welfare. In this broad sense, politics can be one of the most enjoyable and most complex activities available to the individual, for the larger the social arena one moves in, the greater the challenge it presents. A person can deal with very intricate problems in solitude, and family and friends can take up a lot of attention. But trying to optimize the goals of unrelated individuals involves a lot of complexities an order of magnitude higher.

If we consider only material consequences, we might regard selfish politicians as canny because they try to achieve wealth and power for themselves. But if we accept the fact that optimal experience is what gives real value to life, then we must conclude that politicians who strive to realize the common good are actually smarter, because they are taking on the higher challenges, and thus have a better chance to experience real enjoyment.

The concept of flow is useful not only in helping individuals improve the quality of their lives, but also in pointing out how public action should be directed. Perhaps the most powerful effect flow theory could ahve in the public sector is in providing a blueprint for how institutions may be reformed so as to make them more conducive to optimal experience.

A community should be judged good not because it is technologically advanced, or swimming in material riches; it is good if it offers people a chance to enjoy as many aspects of their lives as possible, while allowing them to develop their potential in the pursuit of ever greater challenges.

But no social change can come about until the consciousness of individuals is changed first... those who try to make life better for for everyone without having learned to control their own lives first usually end up making things worse all around."
 Rueda de Casino: A Cuban Communal Dance - conducive to social Flow

In Of Democracy and Time Dilation the "measurement" of time on the quality of our politics and hence our decision-making was considered and very briefly described or "looked at". The ratio of years of participation, the increase in population from about 32 million to 65 million from around 1901-2015 and hence the dilution of representation, along with the representation of more of our powers in the EU Parliament and even lower representation (both turn-out and ratio) eg 1:1 million constituents more or less and the general decline in voter engagement ie General Elections turn-out. We also looked at some of the arithmetic of the Referendum itself in via The Boiling Frog: Frog Fractions: EU Referendum: 51% and further in Understanding The Mountains of Madness that describes the adoption of the politicians' approach to "guiding the public" towards the middle Green colour in the spectrum via the Legacy News-Media blanket coverage: Based on the above Apathy-Worry-Anxiety dynamic above.

What we can learn from the Flow Theory is that Time, Definition of Challenge, Skill, Internal Motivation are all conducive to improving the quality of experience; and when applied to our politics this is very much what is required via a change to encourage these parameters, for example via greater Real Democracy with increased connections to representation such as The Harrogate Agenda provides the conditions for:-

Reducing the layers of abstraction in our politics and reconnecting people

Before I became personally involved and interested in politics, I remember one great holiday I spent with my brother who was living in France. We were in the French South Western region of the Pays Basque in the town of Biarritz (excellent waves) and decided to cycle across the border into Spain, The Basque Country (Euskadi). It was an amazing sense of freedom cycling across the border into a new foreign land (where suddenly my brother's decent-enough French was no-longer understood and I could leap "into my own element" and use my "very-beginner's Spanish" (just!)). On our way towards San Sebastián we decided to veer off course and take some refreshments in a small town and stumbled upon a scene such as (although smaller) this:-

"Some kinda, god-damn town meeting going on..."

Anyway, it was a lot smaller than the above, but there were speeches, brass bands and plenty of people congregated and there was "controlled energy". We had a fine tapas for our "pit-stop" but the impression of that small town square meeting for the Basque "independence and autonomy" always stayed with me, seeing with my own eyes an example of "active real democracy". And I still admire that commitment, particularly when it reminded me of a geography documentary I saw a long time ago:-

The Mondragon Experiment (BBC Documentary, Horizon, 1980)

An experiment in "Worker participation" in Mondragon, a small-town in North-East Spain in The Basque Country. One of the things this idea of attempting to "re-engage people with meaningful work" reminds of:-
"Lack of experience diminishes our power of taking a comprehensive view of the admitted facts. Hence those who dwell in intimate association with nature and its phenomena are more able to lay down principles such as to admit of a wide and coherent development; while those whom devotion to abstract discussions has rendered unobservant of facts are too ready to dogmatize on the basis of a few observations" ~ Aristotle
 Recently the EU Referendum has been looked at and the communication has been simplified at the same time as referencing the source material FLEXCIT, The Great Deception and a myriad of other sources of information. We can think of the EU Referendum as a useful and popular exercise in The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up and in Strange Trails we looked at the sadness and sorrow of people who expend their valuable "psychic energy" (catch-all) only to be let down by the politicians on both sides of the Referendum Question; because the intellectual foundations were not soundly laid as they should have been by our wretched politicians (The knight 'N Knave) (as per Dr. RAE North) were not laid (ie educating and "skilling-up" the people in understanding the politics):-

The product of the politicians neglect of educating people: Anxiety + Apathy => Sadness from a lack of understanding the challenge.

In Pub Signs the attempt was made to provide a visual indication of communication of the Central Point Argument of the EU Referendum as explained in Argument Abstraction.


We'll be offered rich pickings of "Turkish Delight! Turkish Delight!" but it is a promise of false riches based off the above dynamic without resolving this intrinsic self-made political malaise which are politicians are not in the business of reforming the public anxiety-apathy and nor is the legacy media with their worry default of "Bad News". It ties into given the EU Referendum is the first popular referendum in >40 years: The Harrogate Agenda:-
The premise on which our movement is based is that democracy means "people power". The word democracy stems from the Greek word, dēmokratía, comprising two parts: dêmos "people" and kratos "power". Without a demos, there is no democracy. But people without power is not democracy either.

Our current system of government is known as "representative democracy". That phrase is a misuse of the word democracy. People do not hold power: that system cannot by definition be a democracy. We seek to return power to the people. We are concerned with power – who holds it and under what circumstances and controls, and how to get more of it. Above all else, we hold to the core principle that in a true democracy the people must hold the power.

Our objective is to recover power. Our focus is on the acquisition of power. And once we ourselves, the people, hold the power, we can then attend to the many problems and injustices that plague modern society. But without power, there is only protest – and we achieve nothing of any lasting value.

FLEXCIT, the latest version is available from EUReferendum.com. The challenge is high, but if you choose to download it and increase "your skill and understanding" you might find politics is a much more rewarding use of your time and energy... and... as importantly... of your friends and family's too.

I'm off to finally get a printed version from the local print shop and hope to show plenty of people this great work for the people.

Thursday, 15 October 2015

The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up

"The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up"

This video presentation explains Marie Kondo's: "The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up" book. I briefly read an excerpt and it's written in a charming and strangely witty but practical manner. From that, I think she's onto something. In our daily routines, we can categorize what we do according to: Production, Consumption and Maintenance as per Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. If we keep a "To Do List" we can distribute the activities into one of the preceding categories; of which good "Housekeeping" is a daily chore for most people. The same applies to our computers. I was having to use CCleaner software on my old Windows XP Operating System to keep it running faster:-
CCleaner: Computer performance and maintenance on Windows: Complicated!

It was actually quite successful and improved my computer's performance: You can see the complexity of cleaning the OS and it's files and organization: "Dejunking". One day I decided to overhaul the entire operating system, as Microsoft had ceased to service updates for XP and replace it with a GNU/Linux distribution. Here's an analogy I copied from GreenHornLinux:-

House Analogy: Different 'design principles' between Windows OS & Linux OS

Windows on the left starts with a big foundation base (~2Gb disk image). This is mostly "fixed" which means any additions must pile on top. Compare this to Linux which starts with the bare minimum foundation base (From 50Mb-700Mb iso) and allows users to choose the size and the type of building they want. It boils down to a large marketshare of people want the "work" done for them and to merely act as "end-users" who use the computer and it "just works" whereas Linux users can tailor the computer to their various multiple and many needs more effectively and efficiently - so long as they learn how.

There's some very basic rules with computer software:-
  • Bugs are inevitable and cause 'things to go wrong'.
  • The more software code, the more bugs will multiply, in general.
  • Requirements change: Which means the software itself needs changing: Updating, replacing, removing, moving and maintaining.
Coming back to the "Tidying Advice" above: It's a logistical issue: The more things you have the more you have to organize and keep organized: The more maintenance is required. In How do you become a "eurosceptic"? the analogy of increase in complexity comparing an old, bakelite telephone to a modern, smartphone (a full micro-hardware computer OS, effectively!) of the role of governance from the 1970's-20XX's by Dr. RAE North. We looked at the EU "design" in Can we have our cake and eat it too? and again the increase in complexity and instability in Jean Monnet's "Engrenage": Destination Unknown? 

We're seeing the same issues of "Maintenance and Complexity and Instability" in the growth and growth of the EU. It's effectively a bit like Windows OS: For many "end-users" it's been doing all the hard-work that they don't want to know about! But if we look at  the recent EU Offical sources:-

The Five Presidents' Report: Maintenance is time-consuming
 There's more but the above is sufficient; the argument can boiled down to low production is leading to low consumption and hence "we're in maintenance mode". Now coming back to the idea of managing a computer OS and the difference between Linux and Windows: It's easier to maintain an OS that is more basic, a smaller foundation to begin with. This idea allows us to consider an important question on "What is good governance, essentially?" 

James Madison: "Father of the Constitution"

Quoting James Madison in The American Republic: The Fourth Form Government By C. Michael Barry:-
“A good gov­ern­ment im­plies two things: first, fi­deli­ty to the ob­ject of gov­ern­ment, which is the hap­pi­ness of the peo­ple; sec­ond­ly, knowl­edge of the means by which that ob­ject can be best at­tained. Some gov­ern­ments are de­fi­cient in both these qual­i­ties; most gov­ern­ments are de­fi­cient in the first. I scru­ple not to as­sert, that in Amer­i­can gov­ern­ments too lit­tle at­ten­tion has been paid to the last. The fed­er­al Con­sti­tu­tion avoids this er­ror; and what mer­its par­tic­u­lar no­tice, it pro­vides for the last in a mode which in­creas­es the se­cu­ri­ty for the first.”
We can think of this as the basic foundation of our government from which to "tidy-up" everything. As we learnt in Lakshmi: Goddess of Prosperity (1) the "control of the money supply" is closely tied up to the "core functioning" of our governments. Due to the speed of globalization "We The People" as "End-Users" from our governments in both Westminster and the European Union, our requirements are changing rapidly. We need a much more flexible and continuously updating system of governance that is agile enough to service the above core principle of "good governance". See FLEXCIT:-
 "FLexCit", a composite comprising the word "exit" and "FL" from flexible response, with the "C" from continuous development
And as James Madison observes we need a system that: "pro­vides for the last in a mode which in­creas­es the se­cu­ri­ty for the first". We can learn a thing or two from Marie Kondo about "Tidying Up Our Government" and about approaching the right frame of mind. She describes how really we should sort and select the things that really bring "joy and happiness" to our lives.