"All the world's a stage,"
"And all the men and women merely players;"
"They have their exits and their entrances,"
"And one man in his time plays many parts,"
The quote above is from
William Shakespeare's
As You Like It, spoken by 'Jacques' in Act II Scene VII. The speech compares "the world to a stage and life to a play." The above video clip is from
The Coen Brother's
comedy The Big Lebowski and the title quote from
Oscar Wilde who suggests the poor quality of the play (life) is not the script (As You Like It) or the stage (world) but often lies with the cast (people/players).
The film scene above is in my opinion very high comedy value despite the colourful language: Please watch it and enjoy. And if I'm honest it's the benchmark of the the vast majority of the "eurosceptic" and "Pro-EU" arguments and their (lack of) quality, their personality-driven behaviour, which drives miscommunication (arguing at cross-purposes) and general incoherence of meaning and purpose. In
Pattern Recognition we looked at the
"short-circuiting" effect
"prestige" has on the progression of arguments after having looked at this very effect first brought up highlighting the emerging
"Tory Strategy" (as part of a larger general pattern in politics itself) concerning the Referendum in
The Goldfinch and the Gilded Cage and then exemplied or indeed personified in
David Cameron in
Big Ben: The Four-Faced Liar. Recently other "playes" in this political cast were considered and how their roles were shaped by the preceding along with the Media's input (see previously
"I've Been Expecting You...") such as the role that UKIP has assumed in this political comedy over the EU, in
OMG !!!! Parakeet invasion once again you could say personified in
Nigel Farage.
Heath: EEC membership for "The Greater Good"
Why does Johnson try to pretend, against all the evidence, that
Churchill might have wanted Britain to join in with Monnet’s
supranational project? Why, in quoting Churchill’s Albert Hall speech in
1947, does he omit the crucial passage in which Churchill made clear
that, while supporting Europe’s political integration, he saw no direct
part in it for Britain, with its “Empire and Commonwealth”? This was a
position he had eloquently stated as far back as 1930, when there was
first serious talk about creating a “United States of Europe”. Johnson
even betrays his ignorance by suggesting that Churchill was first to
coin this already familiar phrase.
Johnson, for instance, quotes from the Parliamentary debate
of 27 June 1950, on the Schuman Plan, but he omits any the key part of
it which demonstrates, without the slightest hint of ambiguity, that
Churchill was opposed to the plan.
It is
simply darkening counsel to pretend … that by participating in the
discussion, under the safeguards and reservations I have read, we could
have been committed against our will to anything of this nature. I would
add, to make my answer quite clear to the right hon. and learned
Gentleman, that if he asked me, "Would you agree to a supranational
authority which has the power to tell Great Britain not to cut any more
coal or make any more steel, but to grow tomatoes instead?" I should
say, without hesitation, the answer is "no". But why not be there to
give the answer?
"We have our own dream and our own task."
"We are with Europe, but not of it."
"We are linked but not combined."
"We are interested and associated but not absorbed."
Here's an example of a man who played his part in the play to great general acclaim, and yet there are people who would due to this pervert his "performance" as something they would prefer it to be - not what it actually was.
But the actual question is how many "players" are "well-cast" in this EU play?
Nick Clegg: When "image" is more attractive than "substance"
I can't help but think the very primitive role of
"Captain EURO" was played by
Nick Clegg in our actual national discussion of our membership to the Supranational European Union.
Dr. RAE North That debate: a victory against a weak opponent mentions his weak performance where it was mostly agreed he lost to Farage in terms of the "argument" and indeed this seems to have been backed up in part by the poor General Election under Nick Clegg as well as EU Elections the Liberal Democrat Party suffered. His quality of contribution is further discussed in
EU politics: he really is that ignorant.
There is very little value in Nick Clegg's contribution, for several reasons: The argument is no longer dominated by the "orthodoxy of Pro-EU" membership and a side-show to British Politics since "New Labour". As above Cameron's new orthdoxy of "EUrosceptic Reform" has now become
"the latest fashion". His arguments built on lies and deception could only assert the negative of the opposite of EU Membership not the positive of EU membership via
FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt). This behaviour in our arguments was what started my own scepticism as per
How do you become a "eurosceptic"?
When masquerading arguments replaces the real thing
"Danny Champion of the Anglosphere"
Wearily,
that is where Mr Hannan is stuck, in a decade-long groove that has not
advanced an iota - even down to his arrogance in claiming to represent
"most British Eurosceptics".
Of all the issues, though, the one that has progressed least is the
question of regulation. Mr Hannan believes that having to deal with less
regulation (the nine percent that he asserts) is better than the
situation we encounter within the EU. But what he and others don't seem
to realise is that there can be no difference in the amount of
regulation we apply, in or out of the EU - in the short term, at least.
Invariably the above arguments end up becoming each proponents' own personal fiefdom: The arguments become identified with the personality of the proponent or "player" too much. So it is a honestly welcome contribution to the arguments when one of the cast knows what their role is and plays it honestly in this "play":
Enter Right Of Stage:
Andrew Duff :-
Andrew Duff: One Last Hurrah For Chivalry!!
Looking at the title you could be forgiven if you are a "eurosceptic" for reacting in a petty manner and crowing triumphantly that here at last the "EU has dropped the ball" and now we can tell the world and win. I don't see it this way. As a "Brexiteer" (or even "Flexiteer"!) I read the title in this way:-
"Here is a player who knows their lines, knows their role, is experienced on stage and hence plays their part with some talent and dignity."
There are big problems in the world (the stage) in Europe and the UK, with our Money Supply, with debt/deficit, with democracy, our system of governance, with the EUROZONE and with the democratic deficit of the EU itself. Brexit is our focus, but it bears remembering that the entire cast all contribute one way or another in the quality of our arguments on all sides of the debate. Failing to accept this is effectively failing to learn from the mistakes of the good intentions of the people who decided to create the EU in the first place and circumvent effective arguments in the open, honestly put forwards for people to freely choose from.
In the case of Andrew Duff, I disagree with his vision of Europe, but when it comes to: "The world is a stage", at least he's doing his bit to ensure it's well cast.
Thank you.
